Browse project profiles, or search by name, topic or ecosystem to find profiles and guides.
8 verifications
4.6out of 5Weakest axis : Audits
No company issues it and no ledger of owners exists. Its cap is not 21 million but 20 999 999.9769, because each halving rounds down whole satoshis.
11 verifications
4.4out of 5Weakest axis : Token alignment
Runs programs, not just payments. It has no single official client and no supply cap, two things almost every directory gets wrong about it.
7 verifications
Not rated yet
The dollar token that moves the most money, and the only one of these ten whose contract has no public repository. Under half of it lives on Ethereum.
9 verifications
3out of 5Weakest axis : Audits
A chain forked from Ethereum’s client, tied to the exchange that launched it. The repository most data sites link to is the exchange API, not the chain.
10 verifications
3.7out of 5Weakest axis : Token alignment
Built for moving value between institutions. 37 of its 100 billion units are issued but not circulating, and the gap is not explained.
11 verifications
2.7out of 5Weakest axis : Audits
The other dollar token, and the counter example to Tether on the point that matters: its contract has a public repository under an open licence.
11 verifications
4out of 5Weakest axis : Token alignment
The busiest codebase of the ten. The repository data sites point to has been archived since January 2025, so its link shows a project frozen for over a year.
10 verifications
3.8out of 5Weakest axis : Token alignment
A chain that carries a large share of the dollar tokens in circulation. That role, not its own token, is what makes it matter at this size.
7 verifications
Not rated yet
Not a currency. A token backed by American home equity loans, sitting in the top ten with no public code and no chain of its own.
10 verifications
1.8out of 5Weakest axis : Open code
The only one of the ten whose protocol code is not published. Its node repository holds a Dockerfile and a signing key, no source at all.
13 verifications
4.5out of 5Weakest axis : Open code
Splits a yield-bearing token into its principal and its future yield, so the two trade separately. Code public since 2022, licence unresolved.
23 verifications
3.5out of 5Weakest axis : Governance
Charges once to store a file, then keeps serving it with no monthly bill and no stated end date. Runs on its own chain rather than on Ethereum.
15 verifications
3.7out of 5Weakest axis : Token alignment
A network of nodes that reports outside data on-chain rather than a chain of its own. Its LINK token carries no vote at all, only payment and a staking deposit that can be slashed.
18 verifications
Not rated yet
A chain where hiding the amounts is part of the protocol. The repository every directory links to is archived: its node software was switched off in July 2026, and the chain kept going without it.
13 verifications
Not rated yet
Its earliest blocks paid a reward drawn at random from the previous block’s hash, anywhere from 1 to 999,999 DOGE. Every block since has paid a flat 10,000 DOGE, forever, with no cap ever written into the code.
11 verifications
3.8out of 5Weakest axis : Token alignment
GitHub labels its code GPL-3.0. No such file exists anywhere in the repository: its own Cargo.toml, and every licence file actually shipped, say MIT or Apache-2.0 instead.
15 verifications
4.4out of 5Weakest axis : Audits
Its official website repository has taken zero commits in 90 days. The software that actually runs the network lives elsewhere, took 156, and nobody company controls either one.
16 verifications
4out of 5Weakest axis : Audits
A direct fork of Bitcoin’s own code, four times faster and capped near 84 million, not exactly on it. Its privacy layer suffered a real exploit in April 2026, patched the next day.
17 verifications
2.9out of 5Weakest axis : Token alignment
Hides the sender, the receiver and the amount of every transaction by default, with no option to turn that off. Its block reward never reaches zero, and the privacy upgrade several 2026 pages describe as live has not shipped.
21 verifications
4.1out of 5Weakest axis : Token alignment
Burns every lumen collected in fees into a locked account nobody can ever reach, paying no miner and no validator. A bug let it create lumens for real in 2017, before a validator vote ended its own inflation rule in 2019.
14 verifications
4.2out of 5Weakest axis : Audits
The repository most data sites link to, input-output-hk/cardano-sl, has been archived since July 2020 and still carries more stars than the client that replaced it. That successor’s proposal repository has merged 771 pull requests since 2020, feeding an on-chain vote most chains don’t have.
16 verifications
3.3out of 5Weakest axis : Audits
Its fee switch, turned on in December 2025, routes a share of swap fees to buy back and burn UNI. On-chain supply still reads exactly 1,000,000,000: burning moves tokens to a dead address, it never decrements that counter.
A project earns a profile when enough of what it says about itself can be checked at a primary source: its own repository, its own contracts, a node we can query. Everything we could not establish stays on the page, in a table, with the reason. A profile is not a recommendation. The rating it carries measures what can be checked about the protocol, never what the token will be worth.
Each claim carries the address it came from and the date it was read, so anyone can land where we landed. Where an aggregator is our only source, the row says so rather than borrowing its confidence.
There are few profiles because each one takes a day. We would rather publish one page that holds up than fifty that repeat each other.
